Logo
Skip to main content
insight banner image

R v Basque, 2023 SCC 18 – The Supreme Court’s unanimous decision clarifies that credit can be given for pre-conviction driving prohibitions

July 11, 2023
3 min read
Case Comment
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Students
Search

Navigation Menu

  • People
    • People
  • Practice Areas
    • Practice Areas
      • Banking & Finance
        • Banks & Financial Institutions
        • Financing
        • Securities Law
      • Business & Corporate
        • Corporate Law & Governance
        • Intellectual Property & Information Technology
        • Manufacturers, Distributors & Franchisors
        • Mergers & Acquisitions, Business Transactions
        • Tax Law
      • Construction Law
        • Builders' Liens & Bond Claims
        • Construction Litigation & Arbitrations
        • Tendering & Procurement
      • Criminal & Regulatory Defence
      • Estate Planning
        • Estate Administration
        • Guardianship
        • Trusts
        • Wills, Powers of Attorney and Health Care Directives
      • Environmental & Natural Resources
        • Energy & Mining
        • Environmental Law
      • Family Law
      • Health Care
      • Immigration Law
      • Insolvency & Restructuring
      • Insurance Law
      • Labour & Employment
      • Litigation, Dispute Resolution & Appeals
        • Appellate Advocacy
        • Civil Litigation
        • Class Action Litigation
        • Commercial Litigation & Arbitrations
        • Estate Litigation
      • Municipal Law
      • Professional Discipline
      • Real Estate & Development
        • Commercial Real Estate & Development
        • Leases, Landlords & Tenants
        • Residential Real Estate & Conveyancing
      • Regulatory & Administrative Law
        • Administrative Law
  • About the Firm
    • About the Firm
      • History
        McDougall Gauley has a rich history and traces its roots as a Saskatchewan law firm as far back as 1891.
      • Awards & Recognition
        Our lawyers are recognized across the firm’s practice areas. The firm was named a top Prairie Regional Firms by Canadian Lawyer Magazine and is a top Saskatchewan employer.
      • Careers
        To offer the high standard of legal services our clients expect, our team is made up of talented, creative people. If you think you would make a great fit, please let us know.
      • Students
        We want students with drive, integrity, and attention to detail. We strive to give you knowledge, guidance, mentorship, and experience to develop your legal career with us.
      • Contact
  • Insights
    • Insights
  • News
    • News
  • People
  • Practice Areas
    • Banking & Finance
      • Banks & Financial Institutions
      • Financing
      • Securities Law
    • Business & Corporate
      • Corporate Law & Governance
      • Intellectual Property & Information Technology
      • Manufacturers, Distributors & Franchisors
      • Mergers & Acquisitions, Business Transactions
      • Tax Law
    • Construction Law
      • Builders' Liens & Bond Claims
      • Construction Litigation & Arbitrations
      • Tendering & Procurement
    • Criminal & Regulatory Defence
    • Estate Planning
      • Estate Administration
      • Guardianship
      • Trusts
      • Wills, Powers of Attorney and Health Care Directives
    • Environmental & Natural Resources
      • Energy & Mining
      • Environmental Law
    • Family Law
    • Health Care
    • Immigration Law
    • Insolvency & Restructuring
    • Insurance Law
    • Labour & Employment
    • Litigation, Dispute Resolution & Appeals
      • Appellate Advocacy
      • Civil Litigation
      • Class Action Litigation
      • Commercial Litigation & Arbitrations
      • Estate Litigation
    • Municipal Law
    • Professional Discipline
    • Real Estate & Development
      • Commercial Real Estate & Development
      • Leases, Landlords & Tenants
      • Residential Real Estate & Conveyancing
    • Regulatory & Administrative Law
      • Administrative Law
  • About the Firm
    • History
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Careers
    • Students
    • Contact
  • Insights
  • News
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Students
  1. Home
  2. Insights
  3. R v Basque, 2023 SCC 18 – The Supreme Court’s unanimous decision clarifies that credit can be given for pre-conviction driving prohibitions
Share
Authors Matt Schmeling Travis R. Sylvestre
Content

The Supreme Court of Canada in R v Basque recently confirmed that the Criminal Code’s mandatory driving prohibitions are a punishment rather than a sentence. In confirming the distinction between a sentence and a punishment, the Court held that credit may be given for pre-sentence driving prohibitions when a lower court imposes the mandatory driving prohibitions under the Criminal Code.

In R v Basque, the accused was prohibited from driving as a term of her release conditions pending trial. Ultimately the accused, Ms. Basque, plead guilty to the offence; however, by time her guilty plea was entered and she received her sentence, she had already been prohibited from driving for a period of 21 months.

In an 8-0 decision, the Supreme Court concluded that Ms. Basque (at the time of sentencing) had already served the mandatory 1-year driving prohibition and that the sentencing judge had the discretion to give her credit when imposing the mandatory minimum 1-year driving prohibition. In doing so, the Supreme Court reinforced the common law rule allowing pre-sentence credit, so long as the provisions of the Criminal Code do not expressly restrict it.

Notwithstanding the recent decision in R v Basque, it is not entirely clear how Saskatchewan courts will now consider SGI’s automatic driving prohibitions imposed when a driver is charged with impaired driving. In Saskatchewan, when drivers are charged with impaired driving, they are immediately prohibited from operating a vehicle for at least three months while waiting for their criminal trial date. Following the initial period of three months, drivers generally become eligible to enroll in the interlock program, which mandates the installation of an interlock device in their vehicle. This device necessitates the driver to blow into it before being able to operate the vehicle. SGI permits individuals to drive with the installed device in their car while awaiting their court appearance. While many would argue that pre-conviction driving prohibitions go against the presumption of innocence, it reflects the current reality where numerous day-to-day activities are regulated by the state.

It is not clear if a court would credit an accused person with the initial three months’ prohibition or a longer period if the driver did not enroll into the program before their trial. Logically, it would appear reasonable for a court to acknowledge that an accused person has effectively served a driving prohibition by reason of the events in question that led to the criminal charges. That being said, it is necessary to address this matter explicitly in Saskatchewan, as the Supreme Court did not touch upon this particular issue. Either way, regardless of the length of the criminal driving prohibition ordered by the court (whether credit is given or not), SGI’s timelines for the required interlock program (at least currently) remain unchanged following a conviction.

The McDougall Gauley Defence Group has experience defending individuals charged with all types of criminal driving offences. We regularly assistance with sentencing hearings. If you, or a person you know, have been charged with a criminal driving offence, you may wish to contact our Defence Group.

Authors
Matthew Schmeling

Matt Schmeling

Partner
Regina
306-565-5193
mschmeling@mcdougallgauley.com
Travis R. Sylvestre profile image

Travis R. Sylvestre

Associate
Regina
306-565-5120
tsylvestre@mcdougallgauley.com

The views expressed herein are solely the author's and should not be attributed to the MG LLP or its clients. Any postings on legal issues are provided as a public service, and do not constitute solicitation or provision of legal advice. The author makes no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained herein or linked to. Due to professional ethics, the author may not be able to comment on matters in which a client has an interest. Nothing herein should be used as a substitute for the advice of competent and informed counsel.

This web site/blog is presented for informational purposes only. These materials do not constitute legal advice and do not create a solicitor-client relationship between you and MG LLP. If you are seeking specific advice related to your situation, please contact MG LLP for a personal consultation.

Any unsolicited information sent to MG LLP through blogs or otherwise may not be protected by solicitor-client privilege.

MG LLP periodically provides materials on our services and developments in the law to interested persons. For permission to reprint articles or blogs, please contact marketing@mcdougallgauley.com.

This publication is protected by copyright.
© 2025 McDougall Gauley

Related Practice Areas
Criminal & Regulatory Defence

Footer

Footer Menu

Practice Areas
  • Banking & Finance
  • Business & Corporate
  • Construction Law
  • Criminal & Regulatory Defence
  • Estate Planning
  • Environmental & Natural Resources
  • Family Law
  • Health Care
  • Immigration Law
  • Insolvency & Restructuring
  • Insurance Law
  • Labour & Employment
  • Litigation, Dispute Resolution & Appeals
  • Municipal Law
  • Professional Discipline
  • Real Estate & Development
  • Regulatory & Administrative Law
About the Firm
  • History
  • Awards & Recognition
  • Careers
  • Students
  • Contact
  • Insights
  • News
  • People
  • Saskatoon
    500 - 616 Main Street, Saskatoon SK S7H 0J6
    T (306) 653-1212
    F (306) 652-1323

    Regina
    1500 - 1881 Scarth Street, Regina SK S4P 4K9
    T (306) 757-1641
    F (306) 359-0785

© Copyright 2025 McDougall Gauley LLP.  All rights reserved.

Tertiary Menu

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Social Media Menu

Cautionary note: If you are not presently a client of McDougall Gauley LLP, any information you communicate in your email is not protected by lawyer/client confidentiality, nor is a lawyer/client relationship established by our receipt of this email. Before we can discuss your matter, we must ensure that we do not have a conflict of interest. Please do not send us any confidential information in your e-mail.

I Understand