On February 22, 2021, the University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management released the report: 360º Governance: Where are the Directors in a World in Crisis? The report is authored by Peter Dey and Sarah Kaplan and provides 13 guidelines “aimed at providing clarity to boards (of corporations) on how boards can effectively consider the interests of all stakeholders and the rights of Indigenous Peoples in their decision-making”.
The 360º report follows the 1994 report authored by Mr. Dey “Where Were the Directors?” The 1994 guidelines dealt with best practices around board governance, including independence and oversight.
Since then, there have been a significant number of developments, including two Supreme Court decisions (Peoples Department Stores and BCE 1976 Debenture Holders). In these decisions, the Court confirmed that while boards of directors have a duty to act with a view to the best long-term interests of the corporation, they are not obligated to act only in the best interests of the shareholders.
Most boards will be familiar with the historical principle of shareholder primacy, namely that the singular responsibility of directors must be to maximize immediate shareholder value. While still paramount, it is clear that the expectation of directors of corporations has changed, and a much broader scope of stakeholders’ interests must be considered.
Dey and Kaplan set out 13 principles to guide boards when accounting for the interests of all stakeholders in their decision making. Those principles are:
- Corporate purpose
- Board’s duty
- Definition of Stakeholders
- Indigenous Peoples
- Reporting on Stakeholders Impact
- Stakeholder’s Committee
- Stakeholder Conflicts
- Compensation Policies
- Board Refreshment
- Board Diversity
- Organizational Diversity
- Climate Change
- Corporate Activism
Dey and Kaplan, in the 360º report, suggest that these principles be adopted in a “comply or explain” regulatory or legislative framework, and that they become a standard which Courts will apply when assessing the exercise of business judgment by a Board in the exercise of its duties.
It is important to note that, for now, the 360º Guidelines are voluntary principles, and are intended by the authors to reflect best practices and recent trends in practice, legislation and regulation. Time will tell the extent to which these principles are embraced by corporations, legislatures and financial regulators.
The views expressed herein are solely the author's and should not be attributed to the MG LLP or its clients. Any postings on legal issues are provided as a public service, and do not constitute solicitation or provision of legal advice. The author makes no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained herein or linked to. Due to professional ethics, the author may not be able to comment on matters in which a client has an interest. Nothing herein should be used as a substitute for the advice of competent and informed counsel.
This web site/blog is presented for informational purposes only. These materials do not constitute legal advice and do not create a solicitor-client relationship between you and MG LLP. If you are seeking specific advice related to your situation, please contact MG LLP for a personal consultation.
Any unsolicited information sent to MG LLP through blogs or otherwise may not be protected by solicitor-client privilege.
MG LLP periodically provides materials on our services and developments in the law to interested persons. For permission to reprint articles or blogs, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
This publication is protected by copyright.
© 2021 McDougall Gauley